06.23.11

The 5 Biggest Reasons You Should Never, Ever Throw a Collection Lawsuit Away.

Posted in Debt Collector Abuse, Elder Abuse Law, Montana Consumer Law at 5:09 pm by admin

Being served with a collection lawsuit can be tremendously stressful and even embarrassing.  By the time you are sued, you have probably been dealing with debt collection letters and phone calls for months or even years.  Dealing with a collection lawsuit, by this point, can be the last thing in the world you want to deal with.  No matter how much you wish you ignore, don’t!  Here are the five biggest reasons you should never, ever throw that collection lawsuit away:

1.  The Clock is Ticking. Under the rules of civil procedure, you generally have 20 days to respond to a lawsuit.  Once you are served, the clock is ticking.  If you don’t formally respond to the lawsuit, the debt collector will get a default judgment against you.  This means you will forfeit and the collector will automatically win the case.  Most debt collectors are ready to file the papers to get the judgment against you on the 21st day.

2.  A Judgment Gives the Debt Collector Powerful Remedies. Once a judgment is entered, the creditor/debt collector obtains powerful tools to collect.  This can include: a lien against your house or other property, the right to “sweep” all of the money out of your bank account, and the right to garnish your paycheck.  Debt collectors today use powerful tools to track people’s assets and sources of income.  You may think that the debt collector will never find you.  Think again!  The collector probably sued you because they know who you bank with, where you work, or what property you own.  You must make an appearance in the collection case to prevent a debt collector from obtaining the legal right to you’re money from your paycheck or bank account.

3.  Once a Judgment is Entered, You Lose Your Ability to Negotiate. Over 95% of collection lawsuits result in default judgments- the debt collector wins simply because the consumer doesn’t respond.  If you do respond, then the debt collector needs to actually prove you owe the debt.  This means the debt collector’s lawyer needs to work.  By defending yourself and raising appropriate defenses to the collection lawsuit, you increase your settlement position with the debt collector.

4.  Once a Judgment is Entered, You Lose Your Right to Contest the Debt. Debt collectors sometimes sue the wrong person.  They might not really own the debt, and therefore be the wrong party to bring the collection lawsuit.  Or, by the time they file the lawsuit, it may be beyond the statute of limitations.  These are all defenses that can be raised if a consumer responds to the collection lawsuit in a timely manner.  We talk to people all of the time who would have won their collection case had they simply responded before the deadline.  Talk to a collection defense lawyer before the deadline expires.

5.  Once a Judgment is Entered, You Lose Your Ability to Bring Certain Claims Against the Debt Collector. If you are wrongly sued, or sued on a time-barred (past the statute of limitations debt), you may have strong claims against the debt collector under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.  For example, we represented a consumer who was sued by a debt collector on a debt that was past the statute of limitations.  Not only did we get the collection case dismissed, but we brought a claim on his behalf against the debt collector.  A jury awarded him $250,000.  Had he not answered the bogus collection lawsuit, he never would have been able to bring his collection harassment case in the first place!

06.09.11

Edward Jones financial advisor sentenced for fraud

Posted in Montana Consumer Law at 2:51 pm by admin

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy of Missoula sentenced a Bozeman financial adviser Tuesday to 27 months in federal prison for taking $265,820 from her clients’ accounts, using some of the money to pay off her jewelry bill.

Molloy sent Anne Marie Schlenker to prison for 15 months, plus a year of unmonitored home confinement, plus three years of supervised release. She returned nearly $64,000 to her victims, but Molloy ordered her to pay $265,820 more in restitution.

Schlenker worked for Edward Jones and Co. from 2004 until her fraud was discovered in February 2010 and she was fired.

Schlenker wired $11,485 from a 72-year-old retiree’s account into her personal account to pay off her jewelry debt, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. She used another $50,000 of a client’s money to pay for upgrades to a Bozeman-area home she was building.

She pleaded guilty to wire fraud Jan. 27 for stealing money 16 times from five clients. She also agreed to allow the court to disclose her crime to employers or prospective employers.

Financial fraud and misconduct can cause serious injury to people and their finances.  If you or a loved one is the victim of financial fraud, contact the Heenan Law Firm to learn your rights.

Nursing home nurses disciplined, ordered to remedial education courses

Posted in Elder Abuse Law at 2:33 pm by admin

Two registered nurses who previously worked at the Cedar Wood Villa in Red Lodge have been disciplined for multiple counts of unprofessional conduct, according to the state Board of Nursing.

The nurses no longer work at Cedar Wood Villa, administrator Margaret Schwend confirmed Wednesday. She would not say how long either of the nurses worked there and declined to comment on the disciplinary measures the state Board of Nursing has taken.

The basis for the disciplinary actions included falsifying patients’ records, intentionally charting incorrectly or failing to chart; altering and/or manipulating drug supplies, narcotics or patients’ records; failure to follow policies or procedures to safeguard patient care; and failure to use appropriate judgment in administering safe nursing care.

The state Board of Nursing took the disciplinary action against the Johnstons four days after The Billings Gazette reported on the deficiencies at Cedar Wood Villa in May 6 editions.

The actions against the Johnstons and their departure from Cedar Wood Villa coincide with heightened scrutiny the state and federal government have placed on the nursing home for allegedly providing substandard care to residents. Numerous deficiencies at the home were cited in a 101-page report that followed an onsite recertification inspection by the state Department of Public Health and Human Services in December.

Becky Carter, supervisor for the compliance unit of the Business Standards Division, said 12 nurses in Montana in 2009-10 were ordered to participate in remedial education, adding that it is a “regular practice” of the Board of Nursing’s Screening Panel to recommend remedial education courses as part of discipline cases.

The Heenan Law Firm takes pride in representing senior citizens throughout the State of Montana, ensuring that their rights are protected, including cases of physical abuse, nursing home neglect, and financial exploitation.  If you or a loved one are the victim of elder abuse, visit our webpage to learn more information: http://www.heenanlawfirm.com/senior_citizen_abuse.php

Source: Billings Gazette (View Full Article here)